On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:25 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is potentially a bit of a wild idea, but I wonder if having some
> kind of argument to CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() signifying we're in
> "normal" as opposed to "critical" (using that word differently than
> the existing critical sections) would be worth it.
It's worth considering, but the definition of "normal" vs. "critical"
might be hard to pin down. Or, we might end up with a definition that
is specific to this particular case and not generalizable to others.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
