Re: pgbench doc fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pgbench doc fix
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYjzB9zkVBYaNWpigfyvUOYnPf745tRDvo==HUCdq-BCA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench doc fix  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: pgbench doc fix  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:48 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> Yes, you need to send params (thus send bind message) anyway.
> Regarding re-parsing, maybe you mixed up parse-analythis with
> planning? Re-parse-analythis can only be avoided if you can reuse
> named (or unnamed) parepared statements.

So given this, I'm struggling to see anything wrong with the current
wording.  I mean, if you say that you are reusing prepared statements,
someone will assume that you are avoiding preparing them repeatedly,
which -M extended will not do ... and by the nature of that approach,
cannot do.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API