Re: pg_rewarm status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_rewarm status
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYj651SSe9vHs0r_X_8xVF8M0GDtsvkptSmsBNNhNJuHQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_rewarm status  (Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: pg_rewarm status
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up.
> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com)

Well, the patch was rejected, more or less because people felt it
overlapped with pgfincore too much.  I don't particularly agree,
because pgfincore can't load data into shared buffers and doesn't work
on Windows, but other people felt differently.  There was talk of
polishing up pgfincore for possible inclusion in contrib, perhaps
adding this functionality along the way, but AFAIK there's been no
activity on that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: planner missing a trick for foreign tables w/OR conditions
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewarm status