Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYiJHBQqqP6uKkXwNJnzzH4tz1SwGGygW-q-ztoooJw8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'm very tempted to rename this during the move to GUCs
...
> Slightly less so, but still tempted to also rename these. They're not
> actually necessarily pointing towards a primary, and namespace-wise
> they're not grouped with recovery_*, which has become more important now
> that recovery.conf isn't a separate namespace anymore.

-1 for renaming these.  I don't think the current names are
particularly bad, and I think trying to agree on what would be better
could easily sink the whole patch.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]