Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYg-7w15KpvkzgjJGj6Wjuuf9uimZonKH3yBs1bN9Seug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like everyone agrees that this feature is wanted, but Tom is
> still very much opposed to the general approach to implement it, as
> being too dangerous.
> Is it the reviewer's job to try to convince him otherwise?

It's not the reviewer's job to convince Tom of anything in particular,
but I think it's helpful for them to state their opinion, whatever it
may be (agreeing with Tom, disagreeing with Tom, or whatever).

IMHO, the most compelling argument against the OP's approach made so
far is the encoding issue.  I was hoping someone (maybe the OP?) would
have an opinion on that, an idea how to work around it, or something.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Satisfy extension dependency by one of multiple extensions
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory