Re: Inheriting table AMs for partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Inheriting table AMs for partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYehM5MhhQXaACZN_AxhT_Rc-DWnvAsDRruhc2XHVqyHw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inheriting table AMs for partitioned tables  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Inheriting table AMs for partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:59 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Based on this mail I'm currently planning to simply forbid specifying
> USING for partitioned tables. Then we can argue about this later.

+1.  I actually think that might be the right thing in the long-term,
but it undeniably avoids committing to any particular decision in the
short term, which seems good.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Windows 32 bit vs circle test