On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'd rather have a --quiet mode instead. If you're running it by hand,
> you're likely to omit the switch, whereas when writing the cron job
> you're going to notice lack of switch even before you let the job run
> once.
Well, that might've been a better way to design it, but changing it
now would break backward compatibility and I'm not really sure that's
a good idea. Even if it is, it's a separate concern from whether or
not in the less-quiet mode we should point out that we're waiting for
a checkpoint on the server side.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
