Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYcZ0i9omL7bSPEOskc2uxipqh9Mt7Su0Hg3x7DZVF6bw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> That example can be used as an argument against almost any kind of
> overloading.

Yep.

And that may be justified.  We don't handle overloading particularly well.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Request on Extensions
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: warning in code while building on windows