Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYaeb6JL6DjOpHkAOXhOQyC9qoz5VVrU+4-1DNDG24PSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> >> I am assuming that's a "yes" to both the directions: older -> newer , and
>> >> newer -> older minor releases.
>> >
>> > Yes, I believe both directions would work unless we mentioned it the
>> > release notes, in which cases it might not work, or might work older to
>> > newer but newer to older.
>>
>> I don't see how this would get broken in a minor release.  We'd have
>> to change the WAL format or the tuple format, which is definitely not
>> minor release material.
>
> If there was a bug in the xlog stream content we might not be able to
> fix it without breaking compatibility.  Rare, but possible.

OK, fair enough.  But I think the likelihood is extremely low.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Another issue with invalid XML values