Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYZGn4xYEmT67CQ-knc0kSoiauFbkWXSg0P2=rw3OjYWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.
>>
>> It does.  It would be nice if some kind reviewer could help volunteer
>> to clean that up.
>
> I'll give it a go sometime next week.

Thanks, that would be great!

I recommend comparing the section on -c and the section on -C, and
probably updating the former as well as adjusting the wording of the
latter.  We don't want to repeat all the same details in both places,
but we hopefully want to give people a little clue that if they're
thinking about using -c, they may wish to instead consider -C.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Adrian.Vondendriesch"
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Brain fade in gin_extract_jsonb_path()