Re: Boolean partitions syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYZ3Bbqav3TTJMjrpW=hpPACvqen_SGRey2o_0NM2TkDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Boolean partitions syntax  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Boolean partitions syntax
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I've already had two people mention that it'd be neat to have PG support
> it, so I don't believe it'd go unused.  As for if we should force people
> to use quotes, my vote would be no because we don't require that for
> other usage of true/false in the parser and I don't see any reason why
> this should be different.

OK.  Let's wait a bit and see if anyone else wants to weigh in.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Boolean partitions syntax