Re: Check constraints on partition parents only? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYWg7oy3f40rvXFtdSAx2mq-=J_5Q7jwy960TYiKJkVcQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?  (Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil.sontakke@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
<nikhil.sontakke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Yeah, in your case too an initdb would be required, so might as well go down
> the route of a new column. Any preferences for the name?
> connoinh
> conisonly
> constatic or confixed

I'd probably pick conisonly from those choices.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: cheaper snapshots