Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYW_LZese349kc6JNFLi7=ax_-FLBLdO5Wy2EJ1Jsrsew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
> However, it is a little bit difficult to follow the dependencies between
> different partition patches, so I may not always provide sane feedback, as
> seen in [1].
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/579077fd-8f07-aff7-39bc-b92c855cdb70%40redhat.com

Yeah, no issues.  I knew about the dependency between those patches,
but I'm pretty sure there wasn't any terribly explicit discussion
about it, even if the issue probably came up parenthetically someplace
or other.  Oops.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Arseny Sher
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the same transaction
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Pre-existing bug in trigger.c