On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?
>
> Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.
Yeah. I bet there's a lot more useful stuff we could include also,
but everything Andres mentioned is certainly good to put in there.
Alternatively, some of this stuff could go into a README file instead
of the documentation, but I think we've been leaning toward
documenting more C stuff lately, and I'm fine with that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
