Re: assessing parallel-safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: assessing parallel-safety
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYVuf1TFFAHgGGYXeZqsGGKf4n1OemL2kaoFCGTazubPg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: assessing parallel-safety  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: assessing parallel-safety
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> Looks like one of the patches I applied is newer than the one in your list:
>
> HEAD Commit-id: 13a10c0ccd984643ef88997ac177da7c4b7e46a6
> parallel-mode-v9.patch
> assess-parallel-safety-v4.patch
> parallel-heap-scan.patch
> parallel_seqscan_v11.patch

This patch hasn't been updated for a while, so here is a rebased
version now that we're hopefully mostly done making changes to
pg_proc.h for 9.5.  parallel-mode-v10 was mostly committed, and
parallel-heap-scan has now been incorporated into the parallel_seqscan
patch.  So you should now be able to test this feature by applying
just this patch, and the new version of the parallel seqscan patch
which I am given to understand that Amit will be posting pretty soon.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Run pgindent now?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Run pgindent now?