Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYUfevOifhyWqQTGz4RnFbuZV3XYenWrXapuNNVc7Z8yQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> On 01/20/2013 09:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> As a junior reviewer, I'd like to know if my main task should be to
>>> decide
>>> between 1) writing a review convincing you or Tom that your judgement is
>>> hasty, or 2) to convince the author that your judgement is correct.
>>
>> That's a hard question.
>
>
>
> I don't think so. IMNSHO your job is neither - it is to give us your
> independent judgment.

That's pretty much what I went on to say.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)