Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYTNfA37J014ZQwRFx8355WC7mHF7c8g=-vUCFQHsV-=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> So those bits could be considered for integration.

Yes, and they also tend to suggest that the rest of the patch has value.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index