Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYSOMgNOg54i3-QVHq_Ny6e+sT5+-QFJQHt9A53tfaOaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn...
> Should I register this patch somewhere to avoid having it lost in the void?
> Regards,

Well, I committed this, but the buildfarm's deeply unhappy with it.
Apparently the use of GET_8_BYTES() and SET_8_BYTES() is no good on
some platforms...  and I'm not sure what to do about that, right
off-hand.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Rate Limiting
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?