On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Gavin Flower
> <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:
>> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html
>> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'.
>>
>> [...]
>> Databases are physically separated and access
>> control is managed at the connection level. If one PostgreSQL server
>> instance is to house projects or users that should be separate and for the
>> most part unaware of each other, it is therefore recommendable to put them
>> into separate databases. If the projects or users are interrelated and
>> should be able to use each other's resources, they should be put in the same
>> database but possibly into separate schemas.
>> [...]
>>
>
> maybe it's because i'm not a natural english speaker but this sounds
> like we are recommended to put the users in another database. probably
> it is refering to the user's resources... maybe we can make it more
> explicit?
The only thing that seems weird about it to me is that recommendable
is a word that is almost never used by native English speakers. Or at
least not the native English speakers I know.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
