Re: xlog file naming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: xlog file naming
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYQ+dBpbSwzMazf2KFdWmt9UYgy6AC7L4HJ5s3TPwcnwA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: xlog file naming  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: xlog file naming
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Are there any TODO items here?

It's possible there's something we want to change here, but it's far
from obvious what that thing is.  Our WAL file handling is
ridiculously hard to understand, but the problem with changing it is
that there will then be two things people have to understand, and a
lot of tools that have to be revamped.  It isn't clear that it's worth
going through that kind of pain for a minor improvement in clarity.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kasahara Tatsuhito
Date:
Subject: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: huge tlb support