Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYNofQ2q=R2UVqq3QjF_1iC2Nz7KtVZj-prHrYfPOS+HQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> It turns out it is not new in pg10.  I spotted in the log file only by
> accident while looking for something else.  Now that I am looking for it, I
> do see it in 9.6 as well.

So I guess the next question is whether it also shows up if you initdb
with 9.4.latest and then run the same test.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering