Re: trying again to get incremental backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYN=4z9sp5exBxqQJ5QuVkNE_9KtUYoHCErRyLUr8XPYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: trying again to get incremental backup  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:53 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> The first fixes up some things in nls.mk related to a file move.  The
> second is some cleanup because some function you are using has been
> removed in the meantime; you probably found that yourself while rebasing.

Incorporated these. As you guessed,
MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren -> MemoryContextReset had already
been done locally.

> The pg_walsummary patch doesn't have a nls.mk, but you also comment that
> it doesn't have tests yet, so I assume it's not considered complete yet
> anyway.

I think this was more of a case of me just not realizing that I should
add that. I'll add something simple to the next version, but I'm not
very good at this NLS stuff.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup