Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYMncgeZdTJqEBWSRAo4pCQ=4=MyrUzXvwvN5E+rTVMFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:05 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2018-Nov-02, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I strongly object to inserting behavior changes into released branches
> > on the grounds that the behavior wasn't considered carefully enough
> > before feature freeze.
>
> I'm not proposing to change any stable behavior.  The thing I'm
> proposing to change clearly cannot be used by anyone, because it just
> throws errors.

I don't get it.  If the default tablespace for partition is set as for
a regular table, that is a usable behavior.  If it is taken from the
parent table, that is a different and also usable behavior.  Isn't
this part of what you are proposing to change?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Patrick Francelle
Date:
Subject: Re: Constraint documentation
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces