Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYMgtcJnoVhE73vGkX_1Hyqj06FcXZ-xocdhth=LJn-Hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design  (Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the implementation of the clause with the slight change, instead of
> doing column mapping for each side of leaf Queries in planner I make the
> projection nodes output to corresponding column lists only.
>
> This patch compiles and tests successfully with master branch on
> ubuntu-15.10-desktop-amd64.It also includes documentation and new regression
> tests in union.sql.

You should probably add this to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ so
that it doesn't get forgotten about.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] case_preservation_and_insensitivity = on