Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYKjqFPrLZxyPDE5SAb38SXv+=+_KSqN4HsUECi0Oipqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition  (Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have added tests to the
> 0001-Dependency-between-partitioned-table-and-partition_v1.patch. Please
> find attached the v2 patch.

Thanks.  Committed.  I don't think the 0002 patch is an improvement -
sure, it keeps those things in sync, but it also makes the code harder
to read.  On balance I think it's a negative.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments