Re: Posix Shared Mem patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYKQvNQQ2UM_U7OHOcPart+SUmVKL5-Ajgrw1oXcHcOfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>> Robert, all:
>>
>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition.  Is there anything
>> keeping this from going into 9.3?  It would eliminate a major
>> configuration headache for our users.
>
> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable.  It needed work, and
> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.

Yep, agreed.

I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
my list of things to worry about.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side