Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYEQTEPi_PD3_TW+N86+dR5Qkfy+JKJoT0YAfXWhAQjbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:54 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK. Might be worth a short comment.
>
> I added one.

Thanks. I'd move it to the inner indentation level so it's closer to
the test at issue.

I would also suggest reordering the documentation and the
postgresql.conf.sample file so that reserved_connections precedes
superuser_reserved_connections, instead of following it.

Other than that, this seems like it might be about ready to commit,
barring objections or bug reports.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Next
From: Ankit Kumar Pandey
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Teach planner to further optimize sort in distinct