Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation |
Date | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYE+d2DEJ=UMueRZ6TRQC1prjsChocZXo7-3zvpzqHdBg@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:37:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:22:29PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> > Not sure about this. If the upgrades completes successfully and the >> > file is not renamed at the last minute due to some error, that would be >> > a problem as well, because now the old cluster would happily run and >> > perhaps corrupt the data files from under the new cluster. >> >> Well, the basic problem is that the user, before pg_upgrade started, >> installed a new cluster that works. If we rename the old control, but >> rename it back on failure, there are cases we will miss, kill like -9 or >> a server crash, and it will not be obvious to them that the control file >> was renamed. >> >> Of course, if we only rename on success, and there is kill -9 or server >> crash, the old cluster is still start-able, like the new one. >> >> One good argument for the rename early is that on a server crash, the >> system is probably going to restart the database automatically, and that >> means the old server. >> >> Right now we have a clear message that they need to rename the control >> file to start the old server. Not sure what the new wording would look >> like --- let me try. > > I have thought about this, and feel that it would be odd to lock the old > cluster at the start of the upgrade, and then unlock it on a failure, > particularly because we can't always unlock it, e.g. operating system > crash. > > A cleaner solution would be to lock it when we complete the upgrade, > which I have done in the attached patch. I have also added a warning > about restarting the old server when link mode is used, and updated the > documentation to match the new behavior. > > Patch attached. I would like to apply this to 9.2/HEAD. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Performing Consistency Checks > ----------------------------- > Checking current, bin, and data directories ok > Checking cluster versions ok > Checking database user is a superuser ok > Checking for prepared transactions ok > Checking for reg* system OID user data types ok > Checking for contrib/isn with bigint-passing mismatch ok > Creating catalog dump ok > Checking for prepared transactions ok > Checking for presence of required libraries ok > > If pg_upgrade fails after this point, you must re-initdb the > new cluster before continuing. > > Performing Upgrade > ------------------ > Analyzing all rows in the new cluster ok > Freezing all rows on the new cluster ok > Deleting new commit clogs ok > Copying old commit clogs to new server ok > Setting next transaction ID for new cluster ok > Resetting WAL archives ok > Setting frozenxid counters in new cluster ok > Creating databases in the new cluster ok > Adding support functions to new cluster ok > Restoring database schema to new cluster ok > Removing support functions from new cluster ok > Linking user relation files > ok > Setting next OID for new cluster ok > Creating script to delete old cluster ok > Adding ".old" suffix to old global/pg_control ok > > If you want to start the old cluster, you will need to remove > the ".old" suffix from /u/pgsql.old/data/global/pg_control.old. > Because "link" mode was used, the old cluster cannot be safely > started once the new cluster has been started. > > Upgrade complete > ---------------- > Optimizer statistics are not transferred by pg_upgrade so > consider running: > vacuumdb --all --analyze-only > on the newly-upgraded cluster. > > Running this script will delete the old cluster's data files: > /usr/local/pgdev/pg_upgrade/delete_old_cluster.sh I think you should rename the old control file just before the step that says "linking user relation files". That's the point after which it becomes unsafe to start the old cluster, right? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgsql-hackers by date: