Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYD0cSSbd2cmC9AbSy9dvaY=ejPWpqOAV-wi=OsAv4j8w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I can sympathize with the "too much during init" argument, but I don't
> see how moving stuff to the first call would get rid of the problems. If
> we fail later it's going to be just as confusing.

No, it isn't.  If you fail during init the use will expect the slot to
be gone.  That's the reason for all of this complexity.  If you fail
on first use, the user will expect the slot to still be there.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christian Kruse
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1