On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM, <nelson-m-marques@ext.ptinovacao.pt> wro=
te:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: =A0 =A0 =A06341
> Logged by: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Nelson Marques
> Email address: =A0 =A0 =A0nelson-m-marques@ext.ptinovacao.pt
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.10
> Operating system: =A0 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
> Description:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently your binary distribution of PostgreSQL for Enterprise Linux has=
a
> virtual provides for 'postgresql' which has no version associated with it
> (there's good and bad things depending on usage regarding this
> methodology).
>
> Is there a special reason for having a virtual provides without versionin=
g?
> For my specific usage, have the "postgresql" virtual provides with a vers=
ion
> associated (the same of the original package) would be of great value, and
> this situation might end up in forcing me to repackage the whole thing.
>
> Would upstream consider during next updates to make this virtual provides
> associated with the version of the main package? (I don't mind doing the
> necessary changes on the spec file, testing and even help maintaining it =
for
> upstream).
The PostgreSQL project doesn't have any direct control over Red Hat's
spec files, although Tom Lane, a PostgreSQL core team member, also
works at Red Hat. I would suggest that you take this up with Red Hat
directly...
--=20
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
