Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYBeYRy3SrcP7r5xCue-N0mekLjuXKTreymtAompo4VKw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 2:17 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> Since the text is superfluous but not wrong, I won't insist.

OK, committed as I had it, then.

To me, the text isn't superfluous, because otherwise the connection to
what has been said in the previous sentence seems tenuous, which
impacts understandability. We'll see what other people think, I guess.
Perhaps there's some altogether better way to talk about this.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add new GUC createrole_self_grant.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add new GUC createrole_self_grant.