Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY88nD0iU_BbgcXXGPyiQ2ci9tBJrghiMut4sukkZxCSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have increased the number of hash bitmap pages as a separate patch.
> I am not completely sure if it is a good idea to directly increase it
> to 1024 as that will increase the size of hashmetapagedata from 960
> bytes to 4544 bytes.  Shall we increase it to 512?

I don't quite see what the problem is with increasing it to 4544
bytes.  What's your concern?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing