Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY53vKX5TTEjhCcLFxETatTCguACS98BgkwMDcVnU2y9g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> The half unmaintainedness of autoconf (no release in five years counts
> as that imo), sure makes it look like a good idea to move on to cmake or
> such at some point...

I don't necessarily see that as a reason to move.  If we're hitting
bugs in autoconf that are causing problems, and we can't get them
fixed in the upstream, that's a reason.  But switching build systems
won't be frictionless, so I'm not in favor of it unless there's a
clear payoff.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Append's first_partial_plan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Repeated crashes in GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY tests