Re: our checks for read-only queries are not great - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: our checks for read-only queries are not great
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY4rH-oUOW6qw2btvJC4fCMo55NET2nx77rBC7JTjnQWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: our checks for read-only queries are not great  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:22 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I think I agree with you regarding the original intent, though even
> there, as discussed elsewhere, it seems like there's perhaps either a
> bug or a disagreement about the specifics of what that means when it
> relates to committing a 2-phase transaction.  Still, setting that aside
> for the moment, do we feel like this is enough to be able to update our
> documentation with?

I think that would be possible. What did you have in mind?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code