Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY4HCEZMkcpo4tVfMxZPgF1A-a8z1UyXZ3A2uHqPe+GbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote:
>> - We could consider folding fetch_size into "Remote Execution
>> Options", but maybe that's too clever.
>
> If you care to explain, I'm listening. Otherwise I'm going forward with the
> other suggestions you've made.

It's just a little unfortunate to have multiple sections with only a
single option in each.  It would be nice to avoid that somehow.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: why pg_size_pretty is volatile?