Re: pg_plan_advice - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_plan_advice
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY46SyAp8VgFD9hVxz+yNdfxKm_Xy=yUO3t9YMQs541mw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_plan_advice  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 6:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, avocet is producing the output you want, but I think the rest
> are behaving correctly given the way the script is written.

Yeah, this goes back to my "that's embarrassing" comment: obviously, I
really did not proofread this well at all.

> Anyway, I confirm that the patched output is stable with
> debug_discard_caches = 1, so LGTM.

Yeah, I also tested that here. Glad it works that way for you also.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq
Next
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition