Re: How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY3ufD=KFMcrhb_Air2nMf9HFOV+_tB4tx38N3JDncZyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE)  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Re: How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE)  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> One of the things we run into quite a bit is customers who are using
> multiple databases when they should be using multiple schemas. I am sure
> other consultants run into this as well. This gets even more difficult as
> uptime requirements have become all but 100%. So my question is, what would
> this take?
>
> ALTER DATABASE foo LOCATION DATABASE bar SCHEMA baz?
>
> Where if we execute that command, database foo would move to schema baz
> within database bar?
>
> I am fully aware of what it takes on the client side but structurally within
> postgres what would it take? Is it even reasonable?

What if the database contains more than one schema?

You could perhaps try to create a command that would move a schema
between two databases in the same cluster.  It's fraught with
practical difficulties because a single backend can't be connected to
both databases at the same time, so how exactly do you make the
required catalog changes all in a single transaction?  But if you
imagine that you have an infinite pool of top-notch PostgreSQL talent
with unbounded time to work on this problem and no other, I bet
somebody could engineer a solution.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about RI checks
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about RI checks