Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all these months - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY3KPezE5v0NixGYWiPb4Q92Vm8b2FBVVHU8Qan0=MQow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Belated apologies all round for the somewhat provocative $subject; but I
> felt at that moment that this item needed some extra attention.

FWIW, it seemed like a pretty fair subject line to me given your test
results.  I think it's in everyone's interest to get this feature
stabilized before we ship a final release - people will rely on it,
and if it drops even one row even occasionally, it's going to be a big
problem for our users.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handlerflags?