Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY2Lmf=Wkz21rsdR2rb1EjvRjmsSKmCQk2JwY36qp4JXA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the comments.  Let me know if you think I
> have missed anything or any other comments.

If it's safe now, why not remove the error check?

(Is it safe? Could there be other problems?)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: sys_siglist[] is causing us trouble again