Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY-aFMtcfpnr77qAxwQmADEr5PNjDgaN8t=J2aVxz7QHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I actually wonder if we are over engineering things and overestimating
> cost of memmove etc. How about this simpler approach:

Don't forget that you need to handle the case where
maintenance_work_mem is quite small.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2