Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY+EAK6TaLXPSLxf1SBKFMeaybBso_q6M_PBUsRPh17tg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that is one of the most important patches in the list, and I could put
> some effort in it for either review or coding.

I think it would be great if you could elaborate on your reasons for
feeling that this patch is particularly important.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Slave enters in recovery and promotes when WAL stream with master is cut + delay master/slave
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)