Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxozKeme15+NM2vJH8cuYg7DYyMW_uR3ar2Nh9o0t75Y3Aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2  (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
List pgsql-hackers
<br /><br />On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Joshua Berkus <<a
href="mailto:josh@agliodbs.com">josh@agliodbs.com</a>>wrote:<br />><br />>> That's not my recollection.
 Obviously,it's hard to measure this one<br /> >> way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of
test<br/>>> reports<br />>> from people who are not already contributors and could have used some<br
/>>>other way to get the code.<br />><br /> > Do we have download stats for the alphas?   Dave?<br /><br
/>Downloadnumbers for the installers were bordering on noise compared to the GA builds last time I looked, double
figuresiirc. I don't know about the tarballs offhand and can't check ATM.<br /><br />-- <br />Dave Page<br />Blog: <a
href="http://pgsnake.blogspot.com"target="_blank">http://pgsnake.blogspot.com</a><br />Twitter: @pgsnake<br /><br
/>EnterpriseDBUK: <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com" target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br /> The
EnterprisePostgreSQL Company<br /><br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andy Colson
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2