Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy? - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxoxcOUwFmfqw+TA2Ly09ELq12BfuXv8kJ1KzBBausVgBoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
List pgsql-www


On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:29, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 9 Oct 2023, at 15:25, Jonathan Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> On 2023-10-09 08:48, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:46, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>> I happened to notice what seems like a copy/paste error in the funds group
>>> policy document on the website.  The first para on the page explains Core
>>> Team
>>> membership which seems incorrect as they are separate entities.
>>>        https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/funds-group/
>>> Shouldn't we do something like the attached?
>> +1 from me
>
> -1. This is part of the charter that was sent to SPI. Please do not
> modify it.

Fair enough, but should it really be there or is it something which should be
changed at some point?  Right now it implies that the Funds group reports to
the Core Team, or that the Core Team has influence on the Funds group, which
AFAIK isn't correct.

Yes, it is. The core team has the power of veto over the Liaison and Deputy Liaison.

This page is the charter which describes the relationship between the project and the funds group, so it makes sense (because others within SPI don't know our project) to have all the key details in one place. 

--

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?