Re: rc1 or beta4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: rc1 or beta4?
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxoxFrB0c2Z1SFfjEXdvcm6WxeiLYfBvBWJR82JDCqPLjCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rc1 or beta4?  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: rc1 or beta4?
List pgsql-hackers
2011/8/17 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
>
> RC1:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/19869.1312298345@sss.pgh.pa.us

In Tom's final email to the -core thread he mentions I see now that he
did say RC1. I thought we were voting on the date though (not that I
have a problem with it being RC1).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: rc1 or beta4?
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby