Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxowxEj2=6PvofPHy_azBsv3p_k8jkB_jaFnRq2Tw6iQv2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work  (Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
List pgsql-advocacy


On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 11:43, Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 8:58 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 11:27 AM Cornelia Biacsics <cornelia.biacsics@gmail.com> wrote:
  1. Do you see this as an issue the PostgreSQL community should discuss?
No. I've seen no examples of this. The Postgres ecosystem is thriving, and people jump jobs from one employer to another with no friction right now.

+1 

I have not seen any examples of non-compete clauses that prevent the person from contributing to PostgreSQL. The clauses that I have seen & experienced are designed to prevent poaching. 

Agreed - and companies like pgEdge and EDB have policies and often employment contracts that specifically encourage contributions.

--

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Umair Shahid
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work