On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Mike Surcouf <mikes@surcouf.co.uk> wrote:
> Static resources will be good for caching :-) I would expect to see performance gains when using remotely via a
browser. Thankyou.
> I'm not sure whether QtWeb will benefit as much as its local traffic so round trips should be pretty instantaneous.
> Unless QtWeb is horribly inefficient in which case I hope it helps.
Right - and on Windows, I think that is actually the problem which is
why users have reported that running the server separately and using a
regular browser makes a big difference.
FYI, when I was testing on Windows over the weekend, in my test VM,
simply changing "localhost" as the connection target in the runtime to
"127.0.0.1" took the startup time from ~34 seconds to ~24. I lost
count of how many times I tested that, but it was pretty consistent.
That hints to me that the network side is what is less performant -
obviously the resolver, but I suspect also connection setup which is
why I have high hopes for web packing.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
