Re: PgNext: CFP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: PgNext: CFP
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxow5h-eu_epAmh1Ks1n32V9g8T6_Tr+xYKJprDR1u3O-TQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PgNext: CFP  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PgNext: CFP  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-hackers
What date & venue?<br /><br />On Tuesday, January 24, 2012, Joshua D. Drake <<a
href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a>>wrote:<br />><br />> Hello,<br />><br />>
Thecall for papers for PgNext (the old PgWest/PgEast) is now open:<br /> ><br />> January 19th: Talk submission
opens<br/>> April 15th: Talk submission closes<br />> April 30th: Speaker notification<br />><br />>
Submit:<a href="https://www.postgresqlconference.org/talk_types">https://www.postgresqlconference.org/talk_types</a><br
/>><br />> Sincerely,<br />><br />> JD<br />><br />> --<br />> Command Prompt, Inc. - <a
href="http://www.commandprompt.com/">http://www.commandprompt.com/</a><br/>> PostgreSQL Support, Training,
ProfessionalServices and Development<br /> > The PostgreSQL Conference - <a
href="http://www.postgresqlconference.org/">http://www.postgresqlconference.org/</a><br/>> @cmdpromptinc -
@postgresconf- 509-416-6579<br />><br />> --<br />> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (<a
href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br/> > To make changes to your
subscription:<br/>> <a
href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers</a><br
/>><br/><br />-- <br />Dave Page<br />Blog: <a href="http://pgsnake.blogspot.com"
target="_blank">http://pgsnake.blogspot.com</a><br/> Twitter: @pgsnake<br /><br />EnterpriseDB UK: <a
href="http://www.enterprisedb.com"target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br />The Enterprise PostgreSQL
Company<br/><br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: lots of unused variable warnings in assert-free builds
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt