Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sachin Kotwal
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid
Date
Msg-id CA+N_YAckjii4K+pr8RbTVPtXUiAtNp8S-26FAEVXVqnsbnkwEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Thanks for nice patch related to AWS RDS.

Can we have backpatch this patch to PostgreSQL 9.6 and earlier releases ?



Regards,
Sachin

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 28 February 2017 at 17:49, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> I've edited the stated reason for the patch on the CF app, so its
> clearer as to why this might be acceptable.

Robins,

I'm looking to commit the patch version I posted, so I would like your
comments that it does continue to solve the problems you raised.

Thanks

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



--

Thanks and Regards,
Sachin Kotwal

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Arthur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] IF NOT EXISTS option for CREATE SERVER and CREATE USERMAPPING statements
Next
From: Kuntal Ghosh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Trackingwait event for latches)