Re: unaccent contrib - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Vázquez
Subject Re: unaccent contrib
Date
Msg-id CA+KJVfwVgngRQdEQV3L26BiCGXrRsR61XrHH0oxZH-kWmOrDKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unaccent contrib  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: unaccent contrib
Re: unaccent contrib
List pgsql-hackers
Before 9.x, how do unaccent full text searches ?
i

2011/9/21 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com> writes:
> On 21-09-2011 13:28, Daniel Vázquez wrote:
>> "unaccent" is compatible with postgresql 8.4 (but not is in their contrib
>> version distribution)

> No, it is not. AFAICS it is necessary to add some backend code that is not in 8.4.

[ pokes at it ]  Yeah, you are right.  The version of unaccent that is
in our source tree is a filtering dictionary, and therefore cannot
possibly work with backends older than 9.0 (when the filtering
dictionary feature was added).

So I'm wondering where the OP read that it was compatible with 8.4.
Our own documentation about it certainly does not say that.  It's
possible that Oleg and Teodor had some prototype version, different
from what got committed to our tree, that would work in 8.4.

                       regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



--
Daniel Vázquez
SICONET (A Bull Group Company)
Torre Agbar. Avda. Diagonal, 211 - planta 23
08018 - Barcelona
telf: + 34 93 2272727 (Ext. 2952)
fax: + 34 93 2272728
www.bull.es - www.siconet.es
daniel.vazquez@bull.es

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby