On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 2:10 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 at 15:19, KAZAR Ayoub <ma_kazar@esi.dz> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2026, 12:36 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 0002 has an attempt to remove some branches from SIMD code but since >> it is kind of functional change, I wanted to attach that as another >> patch. I think we can apply some parts of this, if not all. > > 0002 sounds really good to have, haven't measured the diff but it's very logical.
I agree with you. I saw very small speedups like 1%-2% but I think changes make sense regardless of the performance improvement.
> Another quick question though, do we need USE_NO_SIMD for any reason? I just remembered that there's some simd paths like json that don't use it.
vector8_eq() and vector8_highbit_mask() don't have non-SIMD implementations, so we need to use USE_NO_SIMD.
